denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
[staff profile] denise posting in [site community profile] dw_news

I'll start with the tl;dr summary to make sure everyone sees it and then explain further: As of September 1, we will temporarily be forced to block access to Dreamwidth from all IP addresses that geolocate to Mississippi for legal reasons. This block will need to continue until we either win the legal case entirely, or the district court issues another injunction preventing Mississippi from enforcing their social media age verification and parental consent law against us.

Mississippi residents, we are so, so sorry. We really don't want to do this, but the legal fight we and Netchoice have been fighting for you had a temporary setback last week. We genuinely and honestly believe that we're going to win it in the end, but the Fifth Circuit appellate court said that the district judge was wrong to issue the preliminary injunction back in June that would have maintained the status quo and prevented the state from enforcing the law requiring any social media website (which is very broadly defined, and which we definitely qualify as) to deanonymize and age-verify all users and obtain parental permission from the parent of anyone under 18 who wants to open an account.

Netchoice took that appellate ruling up to the Supreme Court, who declined to overrule the Fifth Circuit with no explanation -- except for Justice Kavanaugh agreeing that we are likely to win the fight in the end, but saying that it's no big deal to let the state enforce the law in the meantime.

Needless to say, it's a big deal to let the state enforce the law in the meantime. The Mississippi law is a breathtaking state overreach: it forces us to verify the identity and age of every person who accesses Dreamwidth from the state of Mississippi and determine who's under the age of 18 by collecting identity documents, to save that highly personal and sensitive information, and then to obtain a permission slip from those users' parents to allow them to finish creating an account. It also forces us to change our moderation policies and stop anyone under 18 from accessing a wide variety of legal and beneficial speech because the state of Mississippi doesn't like it -- which, given the way Dreamwidth works, would mean blocking people from talking about those things at all. (And if you think you know exactly what kind of content the state of Mississippi doesn't like, you're absolutely right.)

Needless to say, we don't want to do that, either. Even if we wanted to, though, we can't: the resources it would take for us to build the systems that would let us do it are well beyond our capacity. You can read the sworn declaration I provided to the court for some examples of how unworkable these requirements are in practice. (That isn't even everything! The lawyers gave me a page limit!)

Unfortunately, the penalties for failing to comply with the Mississippi law are incredibly steep: fines of $10,000 per user from Mississippi who we don't have identity documents verifying age for, per incident -- which means every time someone from Mississippi loaded Dreamwidth, we'd potentially owe Mississippi $10,000. Even a single $10,000 fine would be rough for us, but the per-user, per-incident nature of the actual fine structure is an existential threat. And because we're part of the organization suing Mississippi over it, and were explicitly named in the now-overturned preliminary injunction, we think the risk of the state deciding to engage in retaliatory prosecution while the full legal challenge continues to work its way through the courts is a lot higher than we're comfortable with. Mississippi has been itching to issue those fines for a while, and while normally we wouldn't worry much because we're a small and obscure site, the fact that we've been yelling at them in court about the law being unconstitutional means the chance of them lumping us in with the big social media giants and trying to fine us is just too high for us to want to risk it. (The excellent lawyers we've been working with are Netchoice's lawyers, not ours!)

All of this means we've made the extremely painful decision that our only possible option for the time being is to block Mississippi IP addresses from accessing Dreamwidth, until we win the case. (And I repeat: I am absolutely incredibly confident we'll win the case. And apparently Justice Kavanaugh agrees!) I repeat: I am so, so sorry. This is the last thing we wanted to do, and I've been fighting my ass off for the last three years to prevent it. But, as everyone who follows the legal system knows, the Fifth Circuit is gonna do what it's gonna do, whether or not what they want to do has any relationship to the actual law.

We don't collect geolocation information ourselves, and we have no idea which of our users are residents of Mississippi. (We also don't want to know that, unless you choose to tell us.) Because of that, and because access to highly accurate geolocation databases is extremely expensive, our only option is to use our network provider's geolocation-based blocking to prevent connections from IP addresses they identify as being from Mississippi from even reaching Dreamwidth in the first place. I have no idea how accurate their geolocation is, and it's possible that some people not in Mississippi might also be affected by this block. (The inaccuracy of geolocation is only, like, the 27th most important reason on the list of "why this law is practically impossible for any site to comply with, much less a tiny site like us".)

If your IP address is identified as coming from Mississippi, beginning on September 1, you'll see a shorter, simpler version of this message and be unable to proceed to the site itself. If you would otherwise be affected, but you have a VPN or proxy service that masks your IP address and changes where your connection appears to come from, you won't get the block message, and you can keep using Dreamwidth the way you usually would.

On a completely unrelated note while I have you all here, have I mentioned lately that I really like ProtonVPN's service, privacy practices, and pricing? They also have a free tier available that, although limited to one device, has no ads or data caps and doesn't log your activity, unlike most of the free VPN services out there. VPNs are an excellent privacy and security tool that every user of the internet should be familiar with! We aren't affiliated with Proton and we don't get any kickbacks if you sign up with them, but I'm a satisfied customer and I wanted to take this chance to let you know that.

Again, we're so incredibly sorry to have to make this announcement, and I personally promise you that I will continue to fight this law, and all of the others like it that various states are passing, with every inch of the New Jersey-bred stubborn fightiness you've come to know and love over the last 16 years. The instant we think it's less legally risky for us to allow connections from Mississippi IP addresses, we'll undo the block and let you know.

burning flag

Aug. 25th, 2025 12:18 pm
stas: (Default)
[personal profile] stas
Новый трамповский указ о сжигании американского флага противоречит решениям ВС, и скорее всего противоречит Первой Поправке. Поначалу я подумал, что это глупый ход, но есть два нюанса:

1. Левые неоднократно подвергали людей преследованию за оскорбление своих религиозных символов - вроде флагов прайда или транс.

2. Ничего подобного по отношению к американскому флагу они делать не будут, наоборот, поскольку Трамп, то они примутся публично и демонстративно жечь американские флаги. Разумеется, не все левые, но отморозков у них полно, и они абсолютно неконтролируемы.

3. Выборы у нас каждые 2 года, и к ним картинки левых, жгущих американские флаги, отлично придутся ко двору. Авось ещё какой-нибудь кандидат в Конгресс, из самых тупых и отмороженых, сфотографируется на фоне - лучшей предвыборной пропаганды и придумать невозможно.

А если года через 2-3 - а такие дела быстро не ходят - ВС это решение отменит, так то ж когда будет, к тому времени у Трампа будут совсем другие заботы.

линки недели - 549

Aug. 25th, 2025 09:36 am
stas: (Default)
[personal profile] stas

Для нашего же блага

1. Bed Bath & Beyond won’t open stores in California, cites regulations
Looks like retail is waking up to the reality of the shithole state

2. Commercial driving school in Washington, Oregon bribed independent testers to get passing grades for failing students: report
Let's set up licensing system they said. It will protect us from unqualified drivers they said.

3. Massive Scandal Threatens to Unravel Newsom’s Gerrymandering Power Grab
Калифорнийские законодатели окончательно охренели от безнаказанности и начали рисовать электоральные карты просто под себя. Насрав на Конституцию штата и законы - а кто их остановит?

4. Colorado Democrats passed and signed into law that businesses are required to use preferred pronouns, if you refuse you can get 4 MONTHS IN JAIL
First Amendment? Never heard of it.

5. The average Chicago Public Schools teacher will see their salary increase to more than $114,000 by the 2027-2028 school year. Just the raises will cost Chicagoans up to $1.25 billion.

6. Bernie Sanders, speaking in 2019: "Scientists are telling us that if we don't get our act together within the next eight or nine years, we're talking about cities all over the world going underwater."
I guess we still have two or three years...

7. Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia “I am the city's accountant, auditor, and paymaster” overseeing $35 billion in spending
He says if he performs an audit to provide transparency and California Democrats don’t like his findings, they cut his staff. Last year they cut his staff by 27 positions

8. Now Comes the California Fire Sale: China-Based Company Is Buying Up Land Incinerated by Firestorms

9. The Civic Hotel in Seattle was rented by the city and county since 2020 to house homeless people.
When the property was vacated and returned last year, the owners found their building contaminated all over with deadly fentanyl and meth residue
Surprise! Of course, the city used some NGO to manage it so they could claim they didn't know anything and didn't do anything. I'm not very sympathetic to the owners though - shouldn't have taken the dirty money.

Who let the DOGE out

10. Nation’s 2 largest teachers unions funneled nearly $50M to left-wing groups, watchdog report says.
Aaron Withe, an expert on public-sector unions, pointed out that the National Education Association spends less than 10% of its budget on what he called "representational activities".
You understand how it works? USAID and what DOGE uncovered is just a small part of a vast pipeline that delivers your tax dollars into Democrat pockets.

Dozens of swastikas

11. Kids in Gaza Chanting Khybar Khybar Ya Yahud!
Khybar was a Jewish city that their prophet Mohammed conquered and killed all the men and took the women as sex slaves.
Невинные мирные детки.

12. Hate preacher who praised terror attacks gets a visa to Australia - while democratically elected Israeli politicians are banned

13. Worker Intifada Occupies Microsoft Main Campus, Demands MS Cut All Ties With Israel
If you didn't have enough reasons to hate Microsoft yet.

14. On the 3rd day of escalating events, the "Intifada" of Microsoft employees takes over a Redmond transit center, celebrates the murder of Jews, and chants (in Arabic), "Go Away, Jews!"

15. Yemeni Children at Houthi Rally threaten America: “We will drink your blood, purify the land from your filth.”
Невинное мирное население, опять же.

16. Foreign Muslim students at the University of Illinois Chicago: "America is the cancer!" "America, secularism, democracy, and capitalism are cancers." "Islam is the answer."

Граница на замке

17. Illegal migrant caught working as police officer in Maine agrees to voluntarily self-deport
Somehow DHS "background checks" did not reveal his status and they said he's legal and eligible to work.

18. The illegal alien truck driver who kiIIed 3 people, FAILED an English Language Assessment, getting only 2/12 answers right and identifying only 1/4 highway traffic signs.
It was also discovered that WA and CA issued Singh a commercial driver's license despite not being eligible for it.
You realize what's going on? They are literally throwing all the rules in the window to prostrate before illegals. They don't make illegals equal to citizens - they put them way, way above. You'd never get a license with 2/12 answers and 1/4 signs.

19. Dem Governor Literally Pardoned a Convicted Killer to Protect Him from Deportation
Yes, including murder.

20. Liberal media rages at arrest of 'family man' in DC—turns out he's an illegal immigrant wanted for child sex assault
They literally don't care. As long as he's illegal, he's a saint.

21. Prosecutors say Somalis in Minnesota are threatening to murder the mother of a 12-year-old girl who was kidnapped and sexually assaulted by Qalinle Ibrahim Dirie.
“The victim’s mother stated that she and her family have been receiving death threats within the Somali community.”
Ну чё, приняли бедненьких беженцев? Обогрели? Довольны результатом?

22. The petition to 'free' the illegal immigrant who made an illegal U-Turn, taking the lives of three Americans, nears 2.5 million signatures.
Как там у Марка Твена было, про слабовольных людишек с неисчерпаемыми запасами слезоточивости о преступниках?

Нас бережёт

23. Army Falls Short of 155mm Production Goal
Very bad.

24. Karen Bass claims fighting crime in DC is racist

25. IRS began criminal probe into Clinton Foundation in 2019 but then suddenly stopped, memos show

Trans-Qaeda

26. Virginia high school suspends 2 boys who complained after trans-identified girl filmed them in male locker room

27. A male student competing against females has won gold in the Girls 400m Varsity race at a Portland high school, setting a season record and finishing over seven seconds ahead of every female runner.
What's even the point in this "competition"?

28. "Nonbinary" Yosemite biologist who hung a transgender pride flag from El Capitan has been fired.
Good. Hang it at your own home.

29. Emily Bridges accuses British Cycling bosses of 'furthering a genocide' after transgender riders banned from female category
Everything is a genocide except murdering Jews.

30. Neo-Nazi changes gender to serve sentence in women’s prison
The criminals aren't the smartest bunch but they finally figured that out.

31. In Canada today, the Muslim Palestinians shut down the Capital Pride Parade in front of the House of Commons.
Оригинальная Ал-Каеда бьёт транс-Каеду. Никакого вопроса "если слон на кита налезет" в иерархии виктимности быть не может - там всё чётко по иерархии.

Culture war

32. Randi Weingarten's union sued the Trump Administration to try to keep DEI in public schools.
One of the most evil legal organizations in the US.

33. Training for therapists instructs mental health professionals to view Trump supporters as 'cult members'—even their own patients

34. Woke Target CEO resigns amid boycotts, declining sales
Поделом.

35. The Disastrous Cracker Barrel Rebrand Finally Gets an Explanation and It Will Surprise No One

Civility and decency

36. ‘Luigi the Musical,’ about accused UnitedHealthcare CEO killer, to debut in San Francisco

37. A student in Florida was nominated by his own teacher as "Most Likely to Become a Dictator" because he was a conservative, a parent just revealed. The teacher allowed students to label him a "Naziphile" because he was interested in WW2 history and ROTC.
This is in Florida. Imagine how much worse it is in blue states.

Лучшие люди города

38. Zohran Mamdani fails at bench press while trying to show-off at Men’s Day in Brooklyn — as Cuomo, Adams roast rival
Шоб вы поняли, этот гигант не смог выжать невероятный вес в 135 фунтов. Его оценки собственных интеллектуальных способностей примерно настолько же завышены. И тем не менее ебанувшиется нью-йоркцы за него голосуют.

39. Paul Pelosi took out two PPP COVID relief loans for $711,708 and $996,392. Both were forgiven.

40. Raskin backs bill severely restricting U.S. arms transfers to Israel
Партия важнее еврейства. В совке так тоже было.

41. Mark Hamill gave wife ultimatum to move to London, Ireland after Trump win—she talked him out of it
Полное ебанько, однако.

42. Stacey Abrams theorizes Trump is "grand ayatollah" who will use "mystical powers" to "anoint prophets" and remain in power forever
Этот кадр Демократы номинировали в Губернаторы. И никто её не критикует, кстати.

43. The Islamist who screamed at a Muslim NYPD officer for stopping rioters from burning down NYC has been revealed as an intern for Zohran Madmani.

44. CA Senator Scott Wiener lies about Anne Frank diary being "banned" in Florida.
Of course, it's not only not "banned" but on official required reading list, but will there be any consequences for the liar? No.

Беспристрастная пресса

45. Lebanese "journalist" Ghadi Francis says that under the Geneva Convention, Lebanese are entitled to kill Israelis anywhere in the world, even in Paris, and added that Israelis should “go back to Poland.”
There are a lot of "journalists" like that.

Международная панорама

46. Израиль: ООН "ошиблась" в 2,5 раза при учете гуманитарной помощи, поставляемой в Газу

47. UN Peacekeeping Force in Lebanon Spends US Taxpayer Money on ‘Gender Diversity’ Training and Therapeutic Yoga Instruction, Drawing Scrutiny From Trump Admin

48. Institutionally, Europe has fallen between two stools. It has lost the vigor and creativity that a continent of decentralized, genuinely sovereign states displayed, yet without acquiring the unity and force of a government with a single leader. One sees only a sort of feeble hydra — many heads, but no power.
True.

49. Watch out, Russia! British Army could come out with all (14) guns blazing
Yes, not a typo. Britain has 14 heavy artillery systems in service. And a whopping 71k army. Putin is shaking in his boots (from laughter).

50. The UK Is Arresting People for Professing Their Love of Bacon

51. Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told
Translation: the government now controls access to VPNs. Completely unexpectedly of course. But think of the children!

52. A Christian woman living in Leicester protested: “We are forced to listen to Islamic prayers from 70 mosques five times a day. And yet they still don't want our church bells to ring. Can someone explain this to me?”
Yes, I can. You have been conquered. Vae victis.

53. How flying the flag became a symbol of revolt
Да, в Англии демонстрация английского флага - это смелый, революционный акт. И в США могло так быть, буквально в одном шажке остановились. И возможно, ещё будет.

54. Canadian man ARRESTED for assaulting intruder during home invasion
В клоунском мире, кто защищает свой дом от грабителя - тот и преступник.

55. Swarm of Jellyfish Forces Shutdown of French Nuclear Power Plant
The French never miss a chance to surrender.

56. You have 243,042 km of coastline & one functioning sub. You couldn’t deter a lost flamingo with dysentery.
To be fair, Canada has 4 (four!) submarines. But only one works at the time, the rest are being fixed.
Does US have one ally with a functioning military? OK, besides Israel, another one?

57. American Knifed In Face By Syrian After Intervening To Protect Women On German Train

Технология

58. Google announces first nuclear site to power its data centers
Good. Normalization of nuclear is long due.

59. US companies have invested between $35 and $40 billion in Generative AI initiatives and, so far, have almost nothing to show for it.
Никогда такого не было, и вот опять...

60. The Toilet of Our Collective Doom

Наука

61. The Nature: "Dominant science (sometimes referred to as Western science) is rooted in colonization, racism and white supremacy: it has been an active participant in the assimilation, marginalization and genocide of Indigenous people."
When the left talks about "SCIENCE", that's what they mean.

Старомыслы не нутрят ангсоц

62. Medical school lecture by Dante King, UCSF and Mayo Clinic professor, last year: White people are “psychopaths” and all white people are racist.
This still being taught at medical schools around the country
Anybody who recently finished med school was taught by one of those.

63. DC campuses disarm police, refuse to work with ICE, train officers in progressive policing

64. The US Institute of Peace instructed its sponsored riot mobs to block roads, occupy government buildings, and deliberately seek to get arrested.

65. Professors are so “centrist” that 88% of students lie about their politics for better grades.
The sad thing is probably some of them aren't woke either - they are just as terrified of being cancelled as their students are.

66. Three professors from Virginia public universities discuss taking down the United States through violence: "We actually need to crash the US—We must stand with the armed resistance.”
But if Trump cuts their funding that's genocide.

Разное

67. On June 14 of this year, Vitomir Maričić took one last gulp of pure oxygen and lay down in a pool. There he remained, cool as a sea cucumber, for 29 minutes and 3 seconds.
Wow.
vit_r: default (Default)
[personal profile] vit_r
ИZZВЕСТИЯ_ДУРДОМА_caption_2023-08-28_1600x200
Ludvig IX. 2025

Поляки начинают немного подозревать


Президент Польши Кароль Навроцкий, Wirtualna Polska, перевод: Европейская ПРАВДА, 2025-08-25:
Чтобы устранить российскую пропаганду и выстроить польско-украинские отношения на настоящем партнерстве и взаимном уважении, чувствительности, я считаю, что мы должны в законопроекте закрепить однозначный лозунг: "стоп бандеризму". А также в Уголовном кодексе – приравнять бандеровский символ к символам, которые соответствуют немецкому национал-социализму, общеизвестному как нацизм, советскому коммунизму, и внести изменения в закон об Институте национальной памяти – Комиссии по преследованию преступлений против польского народа в части, касающейся преступлений ОУН-УПА.

Президент Польши Кароль Навроцкий, Interia, перевод: Европейская ПРАВДА, 2025-08-25:
Я считаю, что мы должны достичь здесь определенной социальной справедливости. Поляки в своей стране должны быть по крайней мере на равных с нашими гостями из Украины. Для меня это принципиальный вопрос, поэтому я не подписал закон о помощи гражданам Украины в таком виде.

Вчера процитировал Приглашаются в пехоту под Покровск / 4kB / 2025-08-21 в блоге у [livejournal.com profile] sapojnik. Уже сегодня зеленомордые предатели нажаловались российской гебне и все комментарии на LJ опять идут под скрин.

Кстати, по немецкоязычным соцсетям гуляет ролик Ich komme aus der Ukraine.


[ Project: War_202202_NsF_Psy RU DW ]: Черновик краткого учебника новейшей истории / / 2022-03-19 (Список основных постов на тему разбора психологии войны 2022-02)

Из жизни символов

Aug. 25th, 2025 08:12 am
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
Анабасис Абрего-Гарсии продолжается: знаменитый Maryland Man, депортированный фашистским режимом в Сальвадор, возвращенный оттуда силами света и ставший их знаменем, легендой и символом борьбы за свободу нелегальной иммиграции сальвадорских бандитов, сдался иммиграционным властям в Балтиморе. Теперь ему светит депортация в Уганду - в полном соответствии с решением суда от 2019 года, который решил, что депортировать его можно, только не в терновый куст родной ему Сальвадор. Адвокаты уже подали иск в федеральный суд в Мэриленде, чтобы и эту депортацию запретили. На том, видимо, основании, что Абрего-Гарсия - знамя и его за это ненавидит фашистский режим.

Нелегко быть знаменем и символом. Хотя, наверно, крайне увлекательно.
vak: (Знайка)
[personal profile] vak
Поиграем в генетику как в кубики. Сколько нужно генов, чтобы вышло что-нибудь размножающееся?

Рекорд простоты известен в природе: всего из двух генов получается цирковирус. И там их целое семейство. Вот как выглядят цирковирусы BFDV и PCV2.



PCV2 заражает свиней, а BFDV птиц. Вирус состоит из кольцевой одноцепочечной ДНК, уложенной между несколькими экземплярами белка Cap.



Второй белок Rep занимается размножением вирусной ДНК в клетке хозяина. Он расщепляет кольцо ДНК цирковируса и даёт полимеразе хозяина начать репликацию. По окончании склеивает результат обратно в кольцо. Вот подробное объяснение от ИИ.



Подробности в статье: Replication of porcine circoviruses

Структуру белков Cap и Rep вируса PCV2 нетрудно добыть скриптом get_protein_sequence.py:
Expandрезультат )
vak: (Default)
[personal profile] vak
В советском союзе пытались повторить такую ЭВМ. Называлась ССБИС или "машина Мельникова". Не вышел каменный цветок.

Горе от LLM ума

Aug. 23rd, 2025 11:23 am
spamsink: (Default)
[personal profile] spamsink
Понадобилось мне в качестве хобби иметь в хозяйстве программу, которая должна уметь следующее:
по данным двум текстовым файлам, одному длиннее, другому короче, она должна находить такое смещение в первом файле, начиная с которого его строки наиболее точно совпадают со строками второго файла, причем строки последнего, состоящие из одной звёздочки, считаются совпадающими с любой строкой.

В моём случае более длинный файл - от силы десяток тысяч строк, более короткий - редко когда более тысячи строк, поэтому наивный O(n*m) алгоритм мне бы годился, просто писать было лень. Но я в промпте это не сказал, и получил от Cerebras программу на Питоне, которая пользовалась этим алгоритмом только в качестве крайнего случая, если не был доступен NumPy.

А если NumPy был доступен, то программа каждой уникальной строке, встретившейся в обоих файлах, ставила в соответствие случайное комплексное число длины 1, кроме *, для которой брался 0. Потом она строила соответствующие массивы чисел, удлиняя при необходимости до степени 2, причем для второго массива числа брались сопряжённые, и делала всему этому делу FFT со всеми возможными смещениями от 0 до разницы длин файлов.
В конкретных деталях алгоритма я не разбирался, но мотивировалось это тем, что для совпадающих строк произведение чисел будет равно в точности вещественному 1, а для несовпадающих - произвольным комплексным числам со случайным Re, в среднем равным нулю. Так как нас интересуют только нетривиальные совпадения, то совпадения со звёздочкой, сиречь умножения на 0, общий результат не изменяют.
Потом в массиве полученных результатов находился максимум, и его индекс объявлялся искомым смещением.

Этим всем делом Cerebras был очень горд, потому что вычислительная сложность получалась меньше, типа O((n+m)*log(nm)) или что-то в таком духе.

Ну и, короче, в тех случаях, когда реальное совпадение было стопроцентным, этот алгоритм с хорошей вероятностью выдавал правильное смещение, хотя и с рейтингом заметно меньше 1 (обычно около 0.8-0.9), а для совпадения с погрешностями результат был произвольным и непохожим на реальность. Пришлось подавить это безобразие, закомментировав "import math", и всё заработало ровно так, как я хотел.

Time for Europe to Get Off Its Ass

Aug. 22nd, 2025 11:47 am
vak: (U.S.A.)
[personal profile] vak
(перепощу целиком, оно того стоит)

It's August 2025. Biden is history. Trump is back. And after three years of war, one thing is beyond obvious: Europe still has no plan.

Billions have been spent. Headlines have been written. Security "guarantees" have been announced and re-announced. But on the ground in Ukraine, what we have is a war of attrition — and a continent still improvising its way toward defeat.

The U.S. Is Out — By Choice

Let's stop pretending. Whatever comfort Europeans took from the idea of "unshakable American support" is gone. Trump has made that crystal clear. He drags his feet on every shipment. He treats Ukraine like a bargaining chip. And when he isn't stalling, he's running interference for Moscow — signaling weakness and chaos that Putin reads as opportunity.

Europe has to understand this: the United States is no longer a partner to be counted on. Any plan that assumes Washington will lead is worse than naïve — it's dangerous. From here forward, U.S. help, when it comes, is a bonus, not a backbone. The future of Ukraine is Europe's responsibility now, or there is no future at all.

Diplomacy Is Not a Strategy

The second illusion is that clever diplomacy will somehow end this war. That if we talk long enough, Putin will blink, or that "security guarantees" without actual firepower will change anything.

That fantasy needs to die.

Putin isn't negotiating for peace. He's buying time — to rebuild his army, to fortify occupied territory, and to wait out Western fatigue. Every delay, every soft promise, every meaningless communiqué hands him that time. And every day without a plan costs Ukrainian lives.

Europe Needs a Real Plan — Now

The blueprint already exists. In The Shield and Denial Strategy and The Ukraine Decision, I've laid out the industrial framework Europe needs: mass air defense production, sustained artillery supply chains, co-production facilities in Ukraine, and enforcement mechanisms that actually work. The details are there.

The cost is modest: €200 per European per year — less than half a percent of GDP.

The deliverables are clear:

Air defense at scale, so Russia's missile and drone terror campaigns fail.

Artillery and drone parity, so Russian offensives collapse by default.

Co-production in Ukraine, to shorten logistics lines and political cycles.

The only thing missing is the political will to execute.

Physics Doesn't Negotiate

Moscow doesn't care about rhetoric. It doesn't care about communiqués or hashtags. What Moscow fears is industrial reality:

Interceptor stockpiles measured in months, not days.

Two million shells delivered on schedule, month after month.

Drones at scale, integrated with precision targeting.

Energy resilience that keeps Ukraine's grid above 95% uptime, even under winter barrages.

When those numbers start moving in the right direction, the Kremlin will notice. Not because Putin suddenly grows reasonable, but because physics doesn't negotiate. When every offensive fails, when the cost of holding territory rises every quarter, when Western fatigue is off the table — that's when Russia's strategy collapses.

Stop Throwing Money — Start Building Discipline

Europe's problem isn't resources. It's discipline. The continent has thrown billions at Ukraine — but in scattershot bursts, without coherent timelines, without enforceable milestones, without accountability.

Take Germany's delayed Leopard tank deliveries in early 2024, or France's stop-start CAESAR howitzer shipments. Each delay sends the same message to Moscow: Europe talks tough but delivers weak.

Drift isn't neutral. Drift is surrender by installments.

Decision Time

This is the moment for Europe to decide whether it wants to win this war or pretend to try. The steps are painfully obvious:

Pass three-year funding laws that auto-disburse, removing politics from logistics.

Establish a European Defense Production Board with teeth to enforce contracts and delivery schedules.

Build and maintain a public delivery dashboard that voters — and Moscow — can see, tracking air-defense systems, shells, drones, and production capacity in real time.

No More Illusions

This war will not be won by speeches, hashtags, or diplomatic fantasies. It will be won by a plan: measurable, predictable, industrial.

Europe has the money. Europe has the factories. Europe even has the blueprint. The only question remaining is whether Europe can afford not to act.

The day Europe executes a real plan, the day predictable timelines start moving metal and men at industrial scale, is the day Moscow realizes the war it thought it could outlast is the war it can no longer win.

That day cannot come soon enough. The question is: will Europe choose to make it happen?
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
А в Мэриленде тем временем ФБР приехало с обыском к Джону Болтону, бывшему советнику Трампа по национальной безопасности, которого Трамп счел идиотом и выгнал, после чего Болтон стал яростным трампофобом и любимым комментатором товарищей слева. ФБР к нему приехало в лучших традициях, рано поутру и в большом количестве, уж не знаю, высадили ли дверь. Речь идет о разглашении секретной информации, а ищут там, значит, секретные документы.

Вот так при Трампе наши доблестные органы стали инструментом личной мести и политической расправы. А ведь при старом режиме делали то же самое исключительно с теми, кто заведомо этого заслуживал. Это уже американский пост-модерн.
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
Лучшего в мире Политолога Маркова™ взяли да и назначили иноагентом. Человек реально каждый божий день много лет ритуально целует Путина в жопу, и вот поди ж ты.

МИГ России:

Политолог Сергей Марков внесен в список иноагентов.
Сам он назвал происходящее чудовищной ошибкой.

"Атакой на меня занимаются враги России и враги политики Владимира Путина. Они либо в будущем покажут себя как предатели или будут уволены как коррупционеры", обещает политолог. Иноагентом пока не подписывается, не привык еще к этой мысли.

Русский пост-модерн, бессмысленный и беспощадный.
vak: (Знайка)
[personal profile] vak
Ответ на настоящее время: 20421 штука.

Вот скрипт на Питоне, который извлекает из базы UniProt/SwissProt полный список известных протеинов человеческого организма: extract_human_swissprot_proteins.py

Результат записывается в файл human_swissprot_proteins.tsv. Для каждого протеина указывается идентификатор, описание и название гена. К примеру, отыщем всё, связанное с инсулином:
$ grep -i insulin human_swissprot_proteins.tsv
F8WCM5 Insulin, isoform 2 INS-IGF2
O00425 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 IGF2BP3
O14654 Insulin receptor substrate 4 IRS4
O15503 Insulin-induced gene 1 protein INSIG1
P01308 Insulin INS
P01344 Insulin-like growth factor 2 IGF2
P05019 Insulin-like growth factor 1 IGF1
P06213 Insulin receptor INSR
P08069 Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor IGF1R
P08833 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 IGFBP1
P09565 Putative insulin-like growth factor 2-associated protein N/A
P14616 Insulin receptor-related protein INSRR
P14735 Insulin-degrading enzyme IDE
P17936 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 IGFBP3
P18065 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 IGFBP2
P22692 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 IGFBP4
P24592 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 6 IGFBP6
P24593 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 IGFBP5
P35568 Insulin receptor substrate 1 IRS1
P35858 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex acid labile subunit IGFALS
P51460 Insulin-like 3 INSL3
P61371 Insulin gene enhancer protein ISL-1 ISL1
Q01101 Insulinoma-associated protein 1 INSM1
Q14641 Early placenta insulin-like peptide INSL4
Q16270 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 IGFBP7
Q6B9Z1 Insulin growth factor-like family member 4 IGFL4
Q6U949 Putative insulin-like growth factor 2 antisense gene protein IGF2-AS
Q6UW32 Insulin growth factor-like family member 1 IGFL1
Q6UWQ7 Insulin growth factor-like family member 2 IGFL2
Q6UXB1 Insulin growth factor-like family member 3 IGFL3
Q86XT9 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 receptor TMEM219
Q8TDV5 Glucose-dependent insulinotropic receptor GPR119
Q8WX77 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-like 1 IGFBPL1
Q96A47 Insulin gene enhancer protein ISL-2 ISL2
Q96T92 Insulinoma-associated protein 2 INSM2
Q9NZI8 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 IGF2BP1
Q9Y4H2 Insulin receptor substrate 2 IRS2
Q9Y581 Insulin-like peptide INSL6 INSL6
Q9Y5Q6 Insulin-like peptide INSL5 INSL5
Q9Y5U4 Insulin-induced gene 2 protein INSIG2
Q9Y6M1 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 IGF2BP2
А вот скрипт, показывающий структуру указанного протеина: get_protein_sequence.py. Опробуем на инсулине:
$ python3 get_protein_sequence.py P01308
Fetching protein sequence for UniProt accession: P01308
UniProt data retrieved for P01308: Insulin
Saved sequence to protein_sequences.fasta

$ cat protein_sequences.fasta
>P01308 | Insulin | UniProt Protein Sequence
MALWMRLLPLLALLALWGPDPAAAFVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKTRREAEDLQVGQVELGGGPGAGSLQPLALEGSLQKRGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCN
Каждая буква обозначает аминокислоту:
  • A - Аланин
  • C - Цистеин
  • D - Аспарагиновая кислота
  • E - Глутаминовая кислота
  • F - Фенилаланин
  • G - Глицин
  • H - Гистидин
  • I - Изолейцин
  • K - Лизин
  • L - Лейцин
  • M - Метионин
  • N - Аспарагин
  • P - Пролин
  • Q - Глутамин
  • R - Аргинин
  • S - Серин
  • T - Треонин
  • V - Валин
  • W - Триптофан
  • Y - Тирозин
vak: (Робот 1)
[personal profile] vak
Не заселить ли Луну и Марс роботами вместо людей? Смотрите, роботы уже кое-что нетривиальное могут.

Статья на сайте Boston Dynamics: "Large Behavior Models and Atlas Find New Footing"

Статья на сайте Toyota Research Institute: "A Careful Examination of Large Behavior Models for Multitask Dexterous Manipulation"

В поисках обзывалок

Aug. 21st, 2025 04:55 pm
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
Давно привыкнув к тому, что Трамп - диктатор, автократ, расист, нацист, фашист, король и вообще узурпатор, увидел сегодня у Мэттью Иглесиаса свежую идею: personalist rule. То есть термин известный, не Иглесиасом придуманный, но Трампа вроде до сих пор так не прикладывали, обходились диктатором и фашистом. Все они, бедолаги, ищут, как бы еще его обозвать, потому что как ни обзывай, толку никакого. Напоминает, как продавцы глобального потепления искали термин пострашнее. Интересно, дойдет ли у них дело до "Это волюнтаризм!"

У Иглесиаса, впрочем, кроме термина ничего интересного нет. Этот personalist rule - разновидность той же самой автократии, которой они так старательно боятся уже десять лет. Статья посвящена выяснению, что лучше для экономического роста - демократия или автократия (спойлер - хер его знает). Читать незачем.
vit_r: default (Default)
[personal profile] vit_r
Pius X. 2025

Приглашаются в пехоту под Покровск


Это не моё. Арти Грин, Арестович, Шелест, разные куклы Кремля, предатели, мерзавцы и прочее отребье. Я только собрал и немного подправил формулировки.

Все, кто за продолжение войны, приглашаются в пехоту под Покровск.
ExpandRead more... )
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
Закономерная судьба постигла приговор, вынесенный Трампу в одном из нью-йоркских судов - там, где его судили за несуществующее жульничество и назначили штраф в полмиллиарда. Апелляционный суд Нью-Йорка этот штраф сейчас отменил на хрен. NYT описывает это так: "Divided Court Eliminates Trump’s Half-Billion-Dollar Fine in Fraud Case. New York appeals judges said that the judgment was excessive, but agreed to uphold the case so the appeal could continue."

Суд там разделился не по поводу штрафа, отменять или отменять, а по поводу самого дела - выбросить его целиком или оставить это следующей апелляционной инстанции. Суд все-таки нью-йоркский, так что Трампу придется апеллировать дальше. Для очистки совести, надо полагать, потому что это было civil case, то есть целиком про деньги, а этот вопрос уже решен.

Санкций против ебанутого судьи, выносящего такие решения, и против прокурорши, которая по политическим мотивам такие дела шьет, не предусмотрено. Так что у прокурорши неприятности если будут, то только из-за ее жульничества с недвижимостью, а у судьи неприятностей не будет вообще. Такие дела.
chasovschik: (Default)
[personal profile] chasovschik
Нытье в ТГ нарастает: вот, к примеру, как сегодня Ольшанский воспринимает "триумф Путина".

Комиссар Исчезает:

Соглашение по Украине, которое сейчас европейцы обкашливают (милое мерзкое словечко) с американцами, – разумеется, крайне невыгодно России, и до того оно нам невыгодно, что если бы его почему-то подписали в Москве, это было бы признанием собственного поражения.

Предлагается получить (да и то гипотетически, на уровне смелого предположения) несколько исторически-символически близких нам городов северо-западного Донбасса и мусорную бумажку о том, что Киев не берут в НАТО, - а взамен расписаться в недостижимости всего, что называется «целями СВО», то есть согласиться с тем, что Украина останется до зубов вооруженной, официальной ненавидящей русских, с правом на армию любого масштаба, на размещение любого оружия и любых военных, с теми же гарантиями, что дает участие в НАТО, но только без обременительной бюрократии этого большого союза, где хотя бы есть капризные государства вроде Венгрии, способные блокировать ее поддержку. Останется со всеми своими крупными городами, в том числе и теми, что Россия юридически присоединила в 2022, с выходом к морю, с огромной общей границей, с ультраправым своим движением, которое тут называют «неонацизмом», словом, со всем набором, который и привел к событию 24 февраля. Просто без города Краматорска. Без города Лимана. Без города Северска.


Дугин тоже впал в пессимизм, причем настолько, что объявил Трампа несуверенным. Ольшанский с ним согласен, разумеется. Это у них, если кто не в курсе, главное ругательство: кто делает не то, что им нравится, на самом деле марионетка сил тьмы и не обладает субъектностью. Все европейские лидеры, к примеру, давно в этой категории, кроме Орбана - они под полным контролем Америки. Вся надежда была на субъектность Трампа, но глобалисты и неоконсы из дипстейта скрутили его с помощью списка Эпштейна, и оказался Трамп просто менеджер под полным контролем Европы.

AGDchan:

Нынешний план перемирия, как он выглядит сейчас, это прямая попытка заставить Россию признать свое стратегическое поражение, бросив нам жалкую кость в виде признания за нами Крыма (но и это не точно) и снятия санкций (но не всех, а выборочно, да и это не факт).


Без Политолога Маркова™ тоже никак, извините. Он утверждает, что Трамп с Вэнсом ребята хорошие, просто ошибаются. Простых вещей не понимают.

Логика Маркова:

Ошибка хорошего парня Вэнса. Вэнс, вице-президент США заявил, что на пути к миру остались два вопроса. Гарантии безопасности Украины и Россия хочет получить территории: закрепить те, которые она взяла и взять ещё.
И это огромная ошибка Вэнса и видимо Трампа и всей видимо их команды.
Они исходят из опыта ближневосточного конфликта прежде всего, где идёт борьба за территории и работает поэтому принцип "мир в обмен на территории ". И Трамп и Вэнс искренне и честно хотят этот принцип применить.
Но он не будет работать. Потому что Россия не ведёт войну за территории. Россия ведёт войну за то, чтобы Запад не делал из Украины Антироссию методами террора.
Поэтому смена режима на Украине, а не захват каких то территорий являются условием мира.


Короче говоря, вся эта публика однозначно хочет всю Украину. Не Покровск какой-нибудь или Славянск, а чтобы вся Украина была под контролем. Все, что меньше этого - поражение, и вся нынешняя миротворческая движуха - путь к поражению. Триумф Путина оказался не таким уж триумфальным. Здесь, впрочем, после вашингтонских встреч рассуждения про провал, проигрыш, предательство и позор тоже как-то поутихли. У меня в лентах эта херня последние несколько дней встречается только в исполнении Илларионова. Но еще неоднократно выйдет зайчик погулять, еще послушаем со всех сторон и про триумфы, и про предательства.

Тем не менее, процесс, похоже, идет в нужную сторону: как известно, настоящий компромисс - это когда обе стороны считают, что проиграли.

UPD: а теперь они все обсуждают угрожающий пост Трампа, который я тут приводить не буду, потому что вербальные маневры Трампа всерьез не воспринимаю и в силу этого обещал Якову Трампа не цитировать.
garote: (laura bow)
[personal profile] garote

Even before my breakup with Эрика was official, I'd been scanning the dating site trying to find new people.

Oh, don’t act so offended! I’d known it was going to end, and I knew she knew. Browsing the profiles was part of how I gauged whether I really wanted to be single.

Once the separation was declared, I felt free to write all the messages I'd been considering, and the most interesting one was Аннет. Her dating site alias was a reference to a fictional character I knew well, and so I wrote my letter in the form of a short story where I approached that character's father, and asked him for permission to date his daughter. I was very proud of the writing, completely independent of whether it impressed Аннет. But I definitely did want to impress her, because we had both answered over a thousand match questions on the dating site, which was rare, and sported a 98 percent match rate even with that high count, which was crazy.

It caught her attention instantly, and we began talking in-depth over email. She described herself as dedicatedly polyamorous, and I was a bit wary of her declarative tone, but I didn't feel like the arrangement was an instant "no." She mentioned a man she'd been involved with back in Maryland, and said she was still seeing him occasionally, and in fact he was visiting her during the weekend she received my first message. I told her to have a good time, and meant it.

We chatted back-and-forth for days, and when we weren't doing that we traded big emails full of lively discussion. I told her all about my polyamory experimentation from a few years ago, and she asked a lot of curious questions about how I compared it with monogamy. The emotional mechanics of it; the way it forced a person to confront ideas about communication and jealousy. I was happy to share it all with someone who didn't just see it as a disaster. She said there had been rough times for her, too, but she'd learned a lot. I said that was reassuring. She said it was all a matter of integrity and respect, and she knew how to manage both, so we should set up a time to meet and see if there was chemistry.

Our first date was on a weekday. I sat at my desk and tried to put in a solid chunk of work so I could enjoy the evening without guilt, but my head wouldn't cooperate. It wasn't Аннет, it was dating and romance in general. Where was I truly headed? Would I ever actually find a "purpose", as my recent ex had so precisely defined it a few months back, when we were comparing notes on our post-breakup lives? I really needed to just relax and let this be a date. Having things be so high-stakes all the time was exhausting.

5:00pm dragged slowly up and then pounced on me, leaving me just enough time to pedal home, shower, change clothes, grab the folding bike, and cycle to MacArthur Bart. I boarded the train for Fruitvale, clattering and lurching under the weight of a thousand commute passengers, and walked down from the platform with only a minute to spare. Аннет's train was late however. She would be arriving straight from work, and since the Bart was part of her regular commute, we could hang out for a while and then she could continue to her house.

I waited, standing tall in my striped shirt, reading articles on my phone. A few thoughts rolled around to the front of my brain.

"She seems great but we've only traded words over the internet. Some people need a slow start in the physical world even if they've welcomed me into their mental one. If I'm too eager, I might overwhelm her."

"The thing that brought us together was mutual love for an author. It might be fun to think of us as characters meeting inside one of those novels. Hmm, no, that's too distracting. I'll just be myself."

I thought I saw her approaching from the corner of my eye, so I made sure to put away my phone slowly, giving her time to get close without feeling embarrassed. As soon as I looked up she grinned and gave me a little wave. I took a step towards her, took her offered hand, and gave it a single firm handshake, like we were two guests at a fancy party. Then I said hello to her little dog: A remarkably intelligent and self-assured creature. Watching Аннет play with him - frolic even - as we locked my bike and walked through the mall to a sunny bench, was very entertaining, and made me feel happy.

That was the first thing I found interesting: She was broadcasting an energy that made me happy.

Аннет was a short, pale-skinned woman with soft but muscular limbs and a wide, smiling face, with a spray of wavy reddish-brown hair bursting out behind her head. This much I knew from photos, but what I really liked was the way she moved as I watched her talk. High, melodic voice, easy laugh, very expressive hands, her head in constant motion, tilting and swaying to add meaning to her words. There was an enthusiasm beaming out her like sunshine, and it felt familiar. I had a feeling like I was already used to it. From previous romantic experience maybe, but maybe from something deeper.

The presence of that energy made many things about our previous conversation click into place. Suddenly I understood the intent and the force behind a tone that had seemed confusing before, in the emails and chat sessions. Even the driven, voracious way she'd dug into the discussion about monogamy now made sense. It was clearly that mind animating this body.

As we sat, the clouds split briefly overhead, and a sunbeam drifted across her eyes. Time stopped as I looked into them. Yellow-green and jewel-like, with a feral wideness, like some creature that belonged in a mythical forest had snuck into the modern world, and I had just accidentally seen through her disguise. I struggled with a compulsion to just stop moving, and thinking, completely.

"Don't turn into a slack-jawed idiot," I thought. "That would bore her, and you'd regret it."

I pushed past the moment and we kept talking, telling stories back and forth and enjoying each others' enthusiasm, both of us laughing. At one point she laughed at a joke and I said "Mission Accomplished!", referring to a joke from a few days ago, and she got so flustered trying to come up with a funny retort, with her face all screwed up and her head sideways, that I burst out laughing, feeling overjoyed, and she gave up and joined in with me. It was a lovely moment. This was the infectious feeling of instant chemistry.

We kept talking, and she missed her bus. I immediately proposed a solution where we would ride Bart for a while and then I would bicycle to my van and drive her home. She accepted it without hesitation. Then we got so busy talking - again - that we left my bicycle behind at Fruitvale station. I only remembered it as the train pulled in at MacArthur. I slapped my forehead. I would have to get to my house on foot, which meant a much longer wait for Аннет.

We emerged at MacArthur and found her a sunny patch of curb to wait with her dog, and before she turned away I placed my hand on her shoulder and looked right at her and said "be safe". She didn't just say "okay" or "I will", she brought her hand up so that it was covering mine, returning the eye contact, accepting the concern and showing that she valued it. I had made a little gesture of chivalry and she'd taken it gracefully. Often these things were hard to balance but I think I got it right.

I turned around and ran most of the way to the van. I didn't want to leave her alone for any longer than necessary. I knew she had her dog, and my reasoning mind told me she would be perfectly fine, but I wasn't acting for my reasoning mind; I was acting from instinct. A man just doesn't leave his date sitting somewhere.

Ten minutes later I rolled up in the van, and as we were loading up she thanked me again for my flexibility and apologized for being a few minutes late earlier in the day. I called up a map to her place on my phone, and handed it to her, and she guided us onto the freeway. I could tell she was subtly impressed by the fact that I already trusted her to just take my unlocked phone. As before, we talked nonstop, all the way up to an overlook of the city, where we parked the van for a while because we still didn't want the date to end yet. The dog seemed happy to hang out in the spacious back.

More storytelling, more laughter. We went a little meta, and I made a few observations about how I saw her mind working. She told me a few key stories that knit together pieces from our online conversation, filling me in, giving me time to tell stories of my own. We had an exchange about the mental faculties of programmers that was a nice back-and-forth, with a slow, thoughtful cadence, working towards shared understanding without the need to be "right". I liked that dynamic. In the middle of the conversation she pulled some knitting out of her purse and worked at it for a while, then stashed it away, keeping her hands occupied, which I found completely adorable. Much later I realized that she'd been giving her hands something to do because what she really wanted was to put them on me, and it wasn't appropriate yet. Eventually we drove the few remaining blocks to her house, and against her better judgement, she brought me inside, to her room, and we continued the conversation there.

Neither of us wanted to end it, but at the same time, we both knew we had real lives to maintain. She needed to eat and sleep, and I needed to eat and recover my bike. I said hello to a few of her housemates, and to another very old and adorable dog, and then goodbye to her dog, and then goodbye to her, standing outside the door, leaning in to hug her, enjoying her returned embrace.

"You're good at hugging!" she said.

"Well, you're the right shape for it!" I replied.

As we drew back from the hug she tilted her head up, and instead of moving my hands to my sides I raised them up and cupped the sides of her face. I had already decided it wasn't the right time to kiss her. I also knew I was taking a risk by even holding her in this possessive way, but I couldn't help myself. It seemed a natural enough gesture; a combination of a parting note, and a selfish chance to frame the source of that energy. Neither of us was making any predictions about the future, but we both acknowledged that we had very strong chemistry and wanted to hang out more.

She said I was interesting to her, and important, because she had thus far never met an adult man who could accept her high energy, and take real pleasure in doing so. That surprised me. Hadn't she met a lot of men? It couldn't be rare.

We tried to get together again soon, but it was a logistical nightmare. She lived way up in the Oakland hills, had no car, worked six days a week, had a two hour commute to San Francisco, and had a dog that was her constant companion because he provided medical support for a metabolic condition she'd had for most of her life. She also had to walk and feed the dog of course. And she lived with three housemates, in a cramped and cluttered room, making privacy difficult.

I worked with it gamely for a while. She was fantastic conversation, very energetic and upbeat, and I loved the dog too. But after two or three more outings I began to see a clearer picture of her mind and how it operated, and realized there was a downside to the energy that drove her. She had a tendency to flit from place to place inside her head, and often missed social and emotional cues, and had an unassailably high self-confidence, which in itself was not a problem, but combined with the previous two attributes caused an ongoing cascade of small misunderstandings that were time-consuming to sort out.

She had even alluded to these character flaws in the online profile I read a month before, and I didn't feel like they were deal-breakers. Eventually people learn emotional signals just from pure exposure to a partner, even if it doesn't come to them naturally. Or they accept their limitation, and learn to welcome the corrections people offer them without rancor. "Oh, sorry, I'm bad at signals sometimes." With Аннет, there was something else in play: When she missed a cue and made a wrong assumption, she would fight against appearing wrong, as though that was what was at stake, even if the correction was put very gently, with carefully chosen words to try and keep ego out of the picture. If you didn't have a deft skill at de-escalating, an argument was guaranteed.

Another thing also became clear, and it was surprising to me. Аннет never, ever talked about her emotions. She would talk about her philosophy, her ethics, her work, her ambitions ... but never about how something made her feel. She had well-examined opinions about everything, and would defend or debate them ferociously, but I never got the sense that she was saying anything that felt like a risk -- that felt like she was making herself vulnerable. She claimed - with great pride - that she was an open book, but the last few chapters had obviously been torn out and locked in a desk somewhere, and I was apparently not supposed to notice, or mind. She was holding herself in reserve and I knew it.

I could even sense it in our kissing. Only a few days after the first date, we became physically involved, and her kissing was very practiced and enthusiastic but there was a measure of passion being held in check. Even when she had sex she turned inward, focusing mostly on enjoying her own body and the sensations that her partner was inspiring inside it. That was probably enough for most men - at least, for a while - because her body was a curvy work of art. But it felt strange to me. She didn't feel a need to reciprocate the attention or share the focus. In fact, after four of five rounds of sex, I began to feel as though she was barely in the room with me.

One week, after she'd been entirely out of contact for about five days, she announced that if I wanted to meet her other boyfriend, he would be in town for a pinball tournament. I told her I was hesitant, but willing. Then she described how it would work: She would be spending the weekend with him, in his hotel room, and I could drive down and visit the two of them and check out the tournament.

Now, at this point, I was still fresh out of an 18-month relationship with Эрика, and she was still my basis for comparison. Эрика liked to talk about her feelings. She needed to. She talked about things she was unsure of, so we could hash them out together, like I did. Аннет was totally different. So again, just as with Кэрол, it wasn't the open relationship or polyamorous aspect that bothered me. It was the way she declared that it was Just So, setting the schedule ahead of me, and then confidently declaring that of course she could manage things with care for my emotions, despite this divided attention. Some part of me had assumed that while she and I were nurturing our relationship past the initial stages, she wouldn't go hooking up with her other lovers out of respect for the process. But that was me, trying to apply my own hypocritical standard to her emotional life, and basing my trust on that standard. Polyamory doesn't work that way. You can't assume anything. You need to make the subtext text, and then work with that until everyone's on the same page.

Even though I knew I was reacting unfairly, I very suddenly cooled to the idea of a relationship with Аннет in general. She had laid claim to a title of "expert at polyamory", but here she was constructing an awkward situation without realizing it. I would be meeting this very important stranger for the first time, by driving to the motel where he and Аннет were going to be canoodling all weekend. It didn't feel good. This was a bad setup, and we needed to discuss it.

Which we did, at length, but the discussion did not go where I expected at all. Аннет insisted that my unease didn't make any sense, since sex was just a fun physical activity, no different than going bowling. Would I begrudge her going bowling with a friend? No, of course not. Then why would I begrudge her having sex with this guy? I told her I didn't buy into her premise. To me, sex was very different from bowling. More intimate, more important.

She said she didn't understand, and wanted explanations. She wanted me to present a reasoned argument. I knew I was coming from a place of emotion, but I also knew there were rational arguments I could make. I gave her one based on anthropology, and she responded with a stump speech about how we should all become masters of our instincts in pursuit of the optimal happiness promised by polyamory. I changed tactics and asked her: Why is sex fun in the first place? It's basically a wrestling match ending in fluid exchange -- how dull. Yet it's pursued endlessly and elaborately by nearly everyone on Earth. The point is, its appeal is not based in reason. We don't pursue sex because some debate team won our minds over as adolescents, we pursue it because we are constructed to do so. Whatever reasoning you add to that is only in service of answering the question of how and why we are constructed that way -- not whether. And, it's the same thing with the perceived importance of sex, sexual propriety, sexual access, et cetera. These are complicated and often sensitive issues with real, legitimate emotions driving them, and you can't redraw their foundations with argument, any more than you can argue a gay man into lusting for vaginas on the grounds that it "makes more sense".

She hand-waved past that, reiterating that it was all a matter of integrity and respect, and that in her past, when people had actually trusted her to handle their emotions with integrity and respect, she did right by them, in spite of their nervousness. I couldn't tell if she was trying to gaslight me, or if she really didn't understand that a fundamental difference had just been laid bare between us: Sex meant more to me than a few rounds of bowling. A piece of my soul was in it.

Аннет gave me a lot more words, in spoken and written form. She said that she loved "all her partners equally", but in practice, the most this actually meant was that she currently loved whichever one she felt like making time to see slightly more than the ones she was currently keeping in the holding pattern. Another favorite saying of hers was, "All my relationships thrive on their own merits, separately." The unspoken addendum being, "therefore your jealousy is illogical." Anyone who's ever had to support a lover depressed from a bad breakup with someone else knows that this idea is wishful thinking, polyamory or no.

I gave up on arguing with her, and asked her to describe the other man in greater detail, thinking that if I could build a picture of him in my mind and find that picture approachable, perhaps this scenario could work. She held forth with, "I owe everything to him. It's a relationship deeper than any I've ever had. After four years, it's a connection that I'm not going to just throw away, just because we live on opposite coasts." I asked for more detail. She described how the man and his wife had been married for 15 years, and she'd moved into their house and lived with them for two of those years. How she'd formed a triad from a marriage that was on the rocks; how she'd moved out west when the drama became unbearable and the wife began to hate her, how the man was now already seeing two other women but was "flying out to California on a regular basis, to show me he still loves me."

As the whole story emerged, I grew a bit disoriented. This was the arrangement she'd learned her skills from? It reminded me of the twisted, dysfunctional scenario I'd weathered several years ago. I told her I saw some parallels with her situation and mine, and I wasn't surprised when she protested that opinion fiercely, setting off another long-winded far-reaching debate about polyamory etiquette, and explained that he was both a perfect gentleman to his non-married women (what I couldn't stop myself from thinking of as his "harem"), and a hero to his wife because he was still working on their marriage. She took it to email, and backed herself up with pages of exposition. From my point of view, she could have easily explained herself with a few short sentences: "I still have feelings for him, and I want to keep seeing him. Sure I could move on if I wanted to, but I don't. I'm not ready to go through that pain."

That would be a statement about feelings, however, and she was determined to keep those out of the discussion. To her, sexual politics were a guide to the appropriate emotions, and if we all acted with rational self-interest, we could all get what we wanted.

After a few days of mini-essays back and forth, I grew exasperated with her -- and with myself. I tried to "bottom line" it: She was lovely, and I could keep spending time with her, in and out of bed, if I would just accept that she wanted to bang a couple of other people on an ongoing basis as well. If I never met those people, it would essentially be like we were dating. The usual "don't ask; don't tell" rule would apply. If I met those people, it would be a journey into the world of polyamory again, and I would need to start accounting for the emotions and quirks of several people, only one of whom I had deliberately chosen. Maybe it could work out fine, maybe not.

I suddenly didn't feel up to the task. Not this soon after my breakup.

Besides, the math was bad. I didn't like the idea of getting involved with someone who was overconfident and evasive with her feelings and carrying a massive torch for a man who had, from my point of view, cynically exploited her by welcoming her into his spider-web of a marriage, and was still exploiting her even now from three thousand miles away. (In my opinion, the best thing he could have possibly done for her was to stop talking and disappear.) To get to a place of real commitment with her - if that was ever possible - I would first have to rise to the top in an ongoing competition, with that guy parked on the throne. It sounded like a slow road to heartbreak.

A few days later, I officially called off the relationship, and moved on with palpable relief. She seemed stunned by my reversal, and also stunned because I had made no attempt to bargain with her, even after all that discussion. I had just picked up my hat and gone for the door after making my discomfort known. She kept pushing me for details, and we corresponded enough for me to admit that I didn't think I could put in the work of polyamory with her in good faith. I said I just wasn't ready.

What was the real truth of the rejection? If we were just dating and I was having fun, how much should I care about all this? Аннет was fun to talk to and a physical knockout. Maybe it was just the logistics: I would be dating a woman living deep in the suburbs with no car and no bicycle, with crazy work hours, little money, and a 24-hour mandatory dog escort, who was dividing her time between me and several others. The cynical part of me probably just thought "I can do better."

A few days later she emailed me to ask what she should do with the socks I left in her room up in Oakland. I told her to just throw them away. About a week after that, I received a package in the mail, and within it, the two dirty socks. I sat on the steps to my house and laughed, and then pitched them into the garbage can. At least we had both treated each other with integrity and respect.

Quite a while later - about a year or so - we spotted each other in a park while she was out walking her dog. She smiled and waved at me, but I didn't wave back because I was on a date at the time. That evening we traded a few kind words of greeting online. Аннет and I weren't a perfect match, but I'll always remember that energy radiating from her face like a sunbeam.

automating it

Aug. 20th, 2025 06:21 pm
juan_gandhi: (Default)
[personal profile] juan_gandhi
#!/bin/bash
set -eu

source config "$HOME/grok.config"

host=https://api.x.ai
url="$host/v1/chat/completions"

question="$*?"
echo "
{
  \"messages\": [
    {
      \"role\": \"system\",
      \"content\": \"You are a helpful assistant that can answer questions and help with tasks.\"
    },
    {
      \"role\": \"user\",
      \"content\": \"$question\"
    }
  ],
  \"model\": \"$model\"
}
" > grok.rq

file_path='grok.rq'

#file_path=$1

curl -s -X POST $url -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" --data @$file_path -o grok.resp
cat grok.resp | jq '.choices[].message.content'

Profile

volodki: (Default)
volodki

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Aug. 26th, 2025 10:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios